-
Re: AI and the type industry, article.
That barrier has already been broken in several ways by digital typography, so that is not what I am saying—and not what I wrote. I said that I prefer ‘may be’ to ‘will be’ when talking about specifi…5 -
Re: AI and the type industry, article.
In the article, you say I would have more cautiously stated this as something that dynamic, context-sensitive typefaces may be something that happens (I would also have avoided the term ‘evolutionary…3 -
Re: Web Font Security
Also, incremental font transfer is coming. Of obvious benefit for larger fonts, especially CJK, but it is something that font foundries could specify as a license requirement for self-hosted webfonts…2 -
Re: Type Network's new CEO
I agree with that. Dependence on platforms owned by other people—and especially dependence on a single platform owned by other people—is not a good idea.3 -
Re: Rules while designing Italics
11.31° is not a ‘rule’. It is an example of an angle that will avoid rounding glitches when using a slant function to shift from vertical to italic angle. Italic angle historically is idiomatic, ofte…8