-
Re: Widespread misunderstanding of AdobeType's license causing foundries to loose revenue.
@"k.l." and @"Miles Newlyn" The reason not to do my edit is that it's complicated to implement in exactly the kind of way that makes lawyers nervous. It would have had to say some…5 -
Re: Widespread misunderstanding of AdobeType's license causing foundries to loose revenue.
@"Christopher Slye". You'll remember that, back in the day when you were the head of Adobe fonts, I asked for an edit to the Adobe terms of use? That edit would have expressly empowered fou…3 -
Re: Widespread misunderstanding of AdobeType's license causing foundries to loose revenue.
Regarding agencies giving the css link to their clients, why should we as foundries care? Yes, it's not permitted by the Adobe license and I always tell people that. But it's not my job to police it.…1 -
Re: Widespread misunderstanding of AdobeType's license causing foundries to loose revenue.
I noticed this is 2019. I don't think it's new, btw. But it is a thing. If anyone wants advice on how to approach a company that's using your fonts in such a way to be sensitive to this issue let me …1 -
Re: EULA question - mobile devices
@"John Butler". I agree. But, have you ever written a EULA? It's really really hard to describe some things. After our last major rewrite I went to a conference where @"Bruno Maag"…1
