-
Re: Save the Chinese typewriter
For an appeal to save what appeared to be substantially pre-1950 technology (i.e. pre-simplified Chinese), it is quite off-putting that it is written in simplified Chinese, and not in the written lan…0 -
Re: TypeDrawers diversity postmortem postmortem
Well, exactly. Somebody going on and on, and obsessing /philosophizing about his own acts and his own thoughts is hardly the way towards diversity/inclusion... :)2 -
Re: BDFs from FontForge; or, Seeking Wizened Font Nerd
@"Micah Stupak" what size are you using? Cjk below 16x16 gets very unreadable, so I hope you are targeting larger :)0 -
Re: Microsoft Font Validator lives!
Regarding the OS/2 weight class issue, why bother to have a table of listed values at all, if they are not meant to be the allowed ones? If any values are allowed, there does not seem to be any reaso…0 -
Re: Microsoft Font Validator lives!
The warning is correct - see https://www.microsoft.com/typography/otspec/os2.htm#wtc . Only 100-900 in increment of 100 is allowed. If you disagree, contact the spec committee, don't blame the softw…1
