-
Re: A new type publishing brand
It’s good that you’re thinking about your brand, and also how that might be represented visually. Yet—and I’m saying this in an over the top manner to make a point: your logo is the least important t…3 -
Re: Two thoughts about Google after Typographics
@ybaggar: Totally respect your opinion of intensely disagreeing with Google Fonts, but asking trollish questions (how much does it pay? oh that’s a job for idiots anyway) isn’t exactly what this foru…2 -
Re: Two thoughts about Google after Typographics
It’s the first Google Fonts family created by a hip indie foundry as far as I know, so I don’t think there’s any precedent to either the printed specimen or the naming convention on that specimen. Wh…1 -
Re: Two thoughts about Google after Typographics
To reply to @"Maurice Meilleur"’s opening post, I don’t think your first point about Google possibly wanting to sell type has any basis in reality. The global type market is a tiny, fragmen…3 -
Re: WOFF Only?
I’m repeating myself on this forum, but if you still think anyone has trouble finding illegal downloads for any typeface, I’d suggest you use your search engine of choice and forget about that notio…9