Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Flawed "M" and "W" in GF Space Mono #1

Open
hpapazian opened this issue Jul 22, 2016 · 5 comments
Open

Flawed "M" and "W" in GF Space Mono #1

hpapazian opened this issue Jul 22, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@hpapazian
Copy link

hpapazian commented Jul 22, 2016 •
edited

The "M" and "W" glyphs in GF Space Mono are designed in a way as to overly disrupt texture, especially when occurring in close sequence (such as in an alphabetized list).

gf_space_mono_flawed-m
The above image is from the –otherwise quite impressive– official specimen book.

Although monospace fonts do have to make severe compromises in various dimensions including density, this particular compromise is extreme and unnecessary, hence technically inexplicable. Note for example how the much more challenging lowercase "m" is handled well.

It's relatively painless to correct this issue by not forcing the middle diagonals of the "M" and "W" to reach the baseline/capline respectively. A potential small loss in the "spirit of the design" to avoid severe disruption of texture would constitute a much-needed trade-off.
@alexeiva
Copy link

Bokmål is missing an å ;)

Interesting observation, @hpapazian
I personally don't mind the darkness in monospaced fonts. As long as it is repeated in other 'wide' characters. I have worked with fonts with no optical correction as a design concept, and it made sense.

I see that the treatment in upper and lower-case m's can be classified as two different approaches. But w isn't compensated in a similar fashion, which makes the diagonals consistent across the font. I am not sure if lightening the M, and other diagonals would be a better solution.

@hpapazian
Copy link
Author

The darkness is not judiciously distributed; the font as a whole is nicely balanced in color... except for the "M" and "W". The lc "m" is indeed solved in a way that cannot directly inform improvement in those two characters; but Space Mono's "m" very much involves good optical correction, unlike in the "M" and "W".

I mentioned above a straight-forward fix for the "M" and "W"; not involving lightening the diagonals (which would probably backfire) but simply not forcing their diagonals to reach all the way to the bounds.

@davelab6
Copy link
Member

davelab6 commented Aug 4, 2016

@hpapazian I spoke to the Colophon team and this will be resolved by adding a stylistic alternate with higher joins

@hpapazian
Copy link
Author

Very encouraging! Thanks to all.

@hpapazian hpapazian mentioned this issue Jan 2, 2018
Open
@hpapazian
Copy link
Author

So was the stylistic alternate mentioned above ever added?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@davelab6 @hpapazian @alexeiva