How does a typeface "sparkle"?

I don't often see the term "sparkle" used, but when I do, I'm always a bit perplexed as to what exactly it is implying. I'm sure some of you have used this to describe your own fonts or those of others. Can you help me understand how a typeface can sparkle?

Thanks,
Curtis

Answers

  • To me this suggests high contrast and abrupt shifts between thicks and thins, perhaps with extra-pointy serifs and terminals.
  • Thomas Phinney
    Thomas Phinney Posts: 3,208
    I have generally suspected that it meant one or more of:
    1. high thick/thin contrast, but with the thinnest bits being very or unreasonably thin
    2. high contrast even within a stroke… generally meaning spiky Latin serifs, especially if they are long ones
    3. (1) and/or (2) when the applications of these things is inconsistent, especially if in a way that distracts from reading
    Arguably mine is just a narrower version of John’s take.
  • Here's a sparkly font, so labeled by its designers: https://commercialtype.com/catalog/farnham/farnham_text
  • John Butler
    John Butler Posts: 367
    Galliard, Mantinia, Arrus, Warnock, and Zapf Renaissance come to mind.
  • Dave Crossland
    Dave Crossland Posts: 1,583
    I don't think it is merely high contrast; it is unexpected contrast at the stroke level, which creates uneven (yet pleasing, if you like it) color at the text-block level. 
  • I've heard "sparkle" in casual discussion to refer to an optical phenomenon regarding counterspace when looking at a large block of text with good letterfitting, but it sounds like that is not what’s being referred to here?
  • Xiaoyuan
    Xiaoyuan Posts: 15
    edited October 13
    maybe you can show us one of the "sparkle" typeface (or at least they claim to be "sparkle") you encountered? 

    ...funny enough, i have one sample string for my typeface...says "sparkling water", becuase i find the animation looks like things shining on the ground. (totally off topic)
  • jectives
    jectives Posts: 4
    I appreciate all of the answers. I feel like I have a better handle on the adjective now. Thank you :)

    To clarify one thing though, "sparkle," as I've seen it used by foundries describing their own typefaces, was never used in a negative way. They were promoting their typefaces or writing official descriptions for new releases.
  • Kent Lew
    Kent Lew Posts: 1,064
    I am most familiar with “sparkle” in reference to old metal fonts made for uncoated stock being found to have too much contrast on coated stock. So, in this case, a pejorative. 
    I am not surprised that foundries that repurpose the term to describe their faces would want to cast it as a positive attribute.
    It seems like an entirely subjective adjective. (Like so much about typeface descriptions. 😉)
  • @Kris Sowersby wrote about the supposed sparkle of Fleischmann’s type in his Epicene design information post. For what it’s worth I‘ve always used sparkle myself to describe Fleischmann’s text color. I always thought that the high level of detail in usual and sometimes unusual places (the baroqueness of it all) is what leads to this, but haven’t studied it any further.
  • Dave Crossland
    Dave Crossland Posts: 1,583
    I am an employee of Google USA, in the font development lead role on the Google Fonts team, and this is personal opinion not an official company statement
    the difficulty of describing a typeface in words suggests AI-generation of new typeface designs from text prompts is unlikely to be successful
    I think the recent release of Jev shows that while LLMs are very popular right now, other approaches to machine learning are still being taken; I don't think non-lexical approaches to generating type are out of the question.
  • John Hudson
    John Hudson Posts: 3,848
    edited October 14
    [Off-topic]
    Yes, non-lexical approaches are likely to emerge, although I think the challenges are a lot more significant than some people might imagine. As @Simon Cozens illustrated in his ILT tech conference talk last week, the current state of image training for glyph shapes is very poor and, I would say, fundamentally ill-suited to the task. Being able to generate a typeface from e.g. set of sketches is a larger, more complicated version of the ‘extend a glyph set’ problem.
  • Stephen Coles
    Stephen Coles Posts: 1,050
    edited October 14
    While foundries might use “sparkle” in various ways, I just want to confirm @Joshua Langman’s definition as what I most often see. Didones might get the descriptor simply due to their contrast, but Fleischmann’s type (and its revivals) is more typically associated with the term because it adds triangular or cupped serifs, and more frequent ball terminals and ink traps that can increase the effect.
  • Dsche
    Dsche Posts: 31


    It is possible (though I cannot say for certain) that different people mean different things by "sparkle," but in a block of text, optical illusions—much like the one shown above—can indeed occur: small gray shapes seem to appear and vanish within the spaces between words and lines.
    We have a specific term for a well-typeset page: the "silvery" typesetting. This refers not only to the "smooth", uniform color of a text block, but also to a subtle, barely perceptible shimmer.
  • John Hudson
    John Hudson Posts: 3,848
    "silvery" typesetting
    Is that a translation of a term used in Russian? I have never heard it in English before.

  • Dsche
    Dsche Posts: 31
    "silvery" typesetting
    Is that a translation of a term used in Russian? I have never heard it in English before.

    Exactly!

    In Russian, this is called "Серебро набора" (*serebro nabora*).

    For a long time, I was convinced that this was a standard typographic term—at least in Europe—likely because it was customary to cite classic European examples to illustrate it; I was quite surprised to discover that this isn't the case.
  • Christian Thalmann
    Christian Thalmann Posts: 2,089
    edited October 16
    For me, a typeface sparkles if it has tiny (but not too tiny), consistently applied, eye-catching features throughout its appearance that create a pleasant amount of visual noise similar to light a rippling water. Serifs and terminals in high-contrast typefaces presumably make the best sparklers. They can't be too small or they’ll get fuzzy and annoying. They have to be consistent so they all sparkle at the same font size. (Presumably the sparkliness of a font is sensitive to size?)
    As for silvery, I am only familiar with the term as (an attempt of) a description of the desirable aspect of a Stradivari's sound.
  • Dsche said:
    We have a specific term for a well-typeset page: the "silvery" typesetting. This refers not only to the "smooth", uniform color of a text block, but also to a subtle, barely perceptible shimmer.
    I almost included the word “shimmer” alongside my own anecdote as I’ve heard them used interchangeably in this context. I think shimmer is the better term for that particular phenomenon
  • Nick Shinn
    Nick Shinn Posts: 2,408
    The opposite of sparkle is dull, like Helvetica.
    Pardon me, neutral.
  • John Hudson
    John Hudson Posts: 3,848
    In Russian, this is called "Серебро набора" (*serebro nabora*).
    Oh. I spoke at a conference called Serebro Nabora in 2014, but had not made the connection that this was a common typographic term in Russian.