Amusing YouTube Video
John Savard
Posts: 1,251
An amusing YouTube video, with the title "I am the Very Model of a Modern-day Typographer", just went up.
It is Elle Cordova who granted us this video, 7 scant hours ago; and in addition to Gilbert and Sullivan, she rightly credits Tom Lehrer for additional inspiration.
Tagged:
7
Comments
-
She has a number of type-related sketches; I like «fonts hanging out»
3 -
Elle did a great job.
The folks at Bitstream (long gone) did basically the same thing (live) with the names of Bitstream fonts at TypeCon 2006:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eq9-skksCu0
Not nearly as clever or as polished. Some of us might recognize a few of the attendees.5 -
Dear God, Elle Cordova strikes again! Ten points, as always.
It almost makes me want to forgo pointing out her misspelling of "minuscule."1 -
Oh, dear. Miniscule means very small, while minuscule means lower-case. I could see a spell-checker mangling that.Joshua Langman said:It almost makes me want to forgo pointing out her misspelling of "minuscule."0 -
Miniscule is a legalized misspelling of minuscule, though0
-
It's a common misspelling, but "minuscule" is still considered correct for both senses.1
-
‘Miniscule’ is an accepted spelling of the adjective meaning small or very small in English, but I would say ‘minuscule’ remains the correct spelling of the noun meaning lowercase letter. I grew up writing ‘miniscule’ as the adjective, but still always use ‘minuscule’ when writing about letters (as a pair with ‘majuscule’). The use of the term in the general adjectival sense dates to roughly the same time in the 19th Century as the misspelling arose, so I wonder if the distinction was being made by some people even then?Hmm. Just realised that I also pronounce them differently.0
-
Are we then, perhaps, encountering the difference between American and British spelling of the same word used for both senses, rather than two different words, as I had thought?Joshua Langman said:It's a common misspelling, but "minuscule" is still considered correct for both senses.0 -
In any case, the Latin source word is spelled minusculus.0
-
Scroll down to "Did you know?":
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/minuscule
Benjamin Dreyer, the well-known copy editor, tackled this very issue in his newsletter today.4 -
FWIW, it’s a paid promotion from Monotype. It’s clearer on her IG post
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DdCU8uLPO4F/?stkn=bjQycmp4dDZuY3A311 -
That’s disappointing.5
-
I don't mind. It's still good stuff.0
-
Kris Sowersby said:FWIW, it’s a paid promotion from Monotype. It’s clearer on her IG post
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DdCU8uLPO4F/?stkn=bjQycmp4dDZuY3A3I followed that link, and then went to @bymonotype. I followed another link there... to something called Kittl Design. Is this an attempt to compete with Canva - while curing (or perhaps even copying) its issue of using a limited font selection as its method of monetization?Also, I have to admit I still wonder if perhaps only the clarification, and not the video itself, is the paid advertisement. The video does encourage the use of more fonts, which is certainly beneficial to Monotype, but it doesn't mention Monotype by name - although I suppose it's entirely possible that all the typefaces she listed in order alphabetical were ones available from Monotype, and Monotype alone, or more principally in their true and original versions - I did not check.EDIT: Upon giving myself the pleasure of watching it once more, I did see that she did once mention a "subscription Monotypical", but I had not realized it was there other than to rhyme.0 -
Special thanks to Monotype for supplying all these fontsFrom the text below the video.0
-
That’s interesting since I’m pretty sure they don’t carry Proxima Nova anymore. And yet it got a mention. I did notice when she said “subscription Monotypical,” so I wasn’t surprised that it was sponsored by them.5
-
@Mark SimonsonIn the video it is called "New Proxima" (translating from "Nova")
That’s interesting since I’m pretty sure they don’t carry Proxima Nova anymore.
1 -
For those who might not be aware (or maybe weren’t even born yet!): the “Nova” in Proxima Nova was in reference to an earlier Proxima Sans. Which some of us actually licensed in the ’90s; and which I probably have a set of old Postscript Type 1 fonts for lying around here somewhere.2
-
I did think “New Proxima” was a clever way to get a rhyme. It’s never occurred to me to call it that.2
-
It occurs to me we don’t know what your middle name is.michele casanova said:@Mark SimonsonIn the video it is called "New Proxima" (translating from "Nova")
That’s interesting since I’m pretty sure they don’t carry Proxima Nova anymore.
I bet it’s Proxima… Michele Proxima Casanova.0 -
@Thomas Phinney I'm sorry, but I don't have a middle name.
I'm not sure that Proximus or Proxima ("nearest" in Latin) would make a good middle name for a person in Italy
1 -
I’m also disappointed that she did not identify the sponsor on Bluesky.Mark Simonson said:That’s disappointing.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 47 Introductions
- 4K Typeface Design
- 496 Type Design Critiques
- 587 Type Design Software
- 1.1K Type Design Technique & Theory
- 674 Type Business
- 899 Font Technology
- 29 Punchcutting
- 542 Typography
- 127 Type Education
- 333 Type History
- 82 Type Resources
- 114 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 33 Lettering Critiques
- 81 Lettering Technique & Theory
- 574 Announcements
- 100 Events
- 116 Job Postings
- 173 Type Releases
- 184 Miscellaneous News
- 270 About TypeDrawers
- 54 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 114 Suggestions and Bug Reports








