Letterspacing (?) as a variable in my singleline script
Options

Grzegorz Luk (gluk)
Posts: 161
I'm working on single-line script typeface (as far in my own SVG format) for engraving purposes, and i want to use letter-spacing as variable value.

is the name "letterspacing" accurate?
Tagged:
0
Comments
-
You could use width since you are changing the widths of the characters, not the space between them (they are touching).2
-
If you want to keep it simple use Width like Mark suggests; ideally I might call it Span.1
-
@Mark Simonson @Hrant H. Papazian Thank You. Most probably Idea for "Width" as "keep it simple" win
It will be hard enough to show CNC-users that a typeface can be variable.
0 -
DJR's latest font, Extendomatic, contains a similar function. In the variable font, the width axis is referred to as "Tracking". Whether that's the most appropriate term is up for debate, but it certainly makes sense to me.
2 -
Matthijs Herzberg said:... axis is referred to as "Tracking"...You're right, "Tracking" could be a good term for it, but from my point of view is too confusing with the slider found in most programs and "bad tracking of scripts".btw. my new test of 2 axes - width (letterspacing) & stroke
0 -
Call the axis GOODTracking. :->0
-
Hrant H. Papazian said:... GOODTracking. ...good idea, especially since "bad tracking" will be available all the time in settings :->
1 -
Beautiful work, Grzegorz!
I encourage you to use wdth and wght axes for this.1 -
+1 to using width ('wdth')
Conceptually, it is a connected script with a width axis. No reason to invent something new.0 -
I wasn’t going to chime in, but since so many people are favoring “width,” I feel like I should maybe share my opinion in case you’re interested in hearing an opposing stance.As a graphic designer who uses fonts more than I design them, I favor either “letter spacing,” “spacing,” or “tracking.”
Just because the letters are connected does not mean there isn’t space between the characters. I would argue that there is the core form of the letter (which has a width), and then there is the connections between the letters which make up the perceived letter spacing.In your first animation, I see your letters getting tighter not narrower.This isn’t necessarily a hill I’m willing to die on (especially if you don’t see yourself drawing an axis with narrower or wider base/core letterforms), but I figured I’d share my thoughts in case you find them valuable.5 -
One concern I have with a spacing/tracking axis is that it needs to work across the entire design space, and across all the kerning.
I'm yet to see any demo font that does this, despite it being talked about since 2016.
Has anyone seen such a font?
0 -
@Thomas Phinney thank You@Matthew Smith[...] (especially if you don’t see yourself drawing an axis with narrower or wider base/core letterforms) [...]One concern I have with a spacing/tracking axis is that it needs to work across the entire design space, and across all the kerning. [...]
1 -
LOL
Since you are planning to add such an axis in future, I retract my proposal.
I'm curious what you propose instead of width.
In the parametric axes system, changes isolated to X and Y dimensions use that as basis of the first letter of the axis code, and then if it's effects ink (opacity) or space (transparency) for the second letter. So I will probably register something "XT??" for this with Google Fonts. XTRK for X Transparency Tracking? XTSP for X Transparency Spacing?1 -
Right, if there is a significant chance of having both kinds of width axis in the future, def save the one called “width” for the more normal implementation.0
-
first "quick and dirty" prototype of normal Width axis made me sure that it is worth keeping the name for the future - cooperation of these two axes has potential
now I like the Span proposal of @Hrant H. Papazian more and more...
3 -
I think its good for users to have separate control of the 'X Transparency' changes within a glyph from the 'X Transparency Spacing' changes between glyphs, instead of blending them.
The initial lexend.com fonts by Thomas Jockin did this, with a single LXND axis, and the latest ones at https://github.com/FontBureau/fb-lexend split them out.0 -
first demo engravings:and first pre-release on-line: www.glukfonts.pl/g/LimpelkaSLwith Span & Width axes in Variables tab.Thank You for all Sugestions!0
-
Nice!
Congrats, and good luck.0 -
Hrant H. Papazian said:Nice!
Congrats, and good luck.Thank You,I think I will need a lot of luck with my "TypoGuerilla"
0
Categories
- All Categories
- 46 Introductions
- 3.8K Typeface Design
- 476 Type Design Critiques
- 555 Type Design Software
- 1.1K Type Design Technique & Theory
- 640 Type Business
- 831 Font Technology
- 29 Punchcutting
- 508 Typography
- 120 Type Education
- 313 Type History
- 75 Type Resources
- 109 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 30 Lettering Critiques
- 79 Lettering Technique & Theory
- 533 Announcements
- 86 Events
- 110 Job Postings
- 167 Type Releases
- 169 Miscellaneous News
- 274 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 119 Suggestions and Bug Reports