metrics in InDesign different than in FontForge


Bonjour, 

Thank you for lettin' me in. I found this website while I was looking for an answer to this question: how come metrics differ between a design program and a layout program? And how can we fix it? I just made my 1st font with Font Forge. And when I test it in InDesign, the metrics are different than the ones I defined in Font Forge. It's a bit better if I export the font in true type instead of open type... but it's still different. Please find hereabove an illustration:
- in black (and behind), the metrics in Font Forge,
- in yellow, the font used in InDesign (got exported as a true type),
- and in magenta (on top) the font used in InDesign but exported as an open type.

Thank you!

Kind regards,
Samuel Durt

Comments

  • John HudsonJohn Hudson Posts: 2,169
    First thing to check: in InDesign, is kerning set to Metrics or to Optical? If it were set to Optical, you would get autokerning that would override font spacing. [And no, I don't know whether that would explain the difference between TTF and CFF fonts, but it is the first thing to rule out when talking about spacing in InDesign.]
  • I let 'metrics' in InDesign.
  • John HudsonJohn Hudson Posts: 2,169
    Hmm.

    Okay, next step would be to check the metrics of the compiled fonts to the metrics of your source. I would try to do this using a different tool than the one you use to generate the font, i.e. don’t just open the OTF or TTF in the same design tool as your source. Ideally, use something like OTMaster, so you can check the actual binary data.

    This step is to confirm that the issue is not due to a problem in the font generation, rather than a problem in InDesign.
  • Chris LozosChris Lozos Posts: 1,371
    What OPM did you use? For anything different than 1000, ID will round your values to what you would expect for 1000. A kern of 32 units in a font drawn at 2048 would show as about 15 after rounding.
  • Although what Chris writes is entirely correct... that should only affect InDesign’s display of the kerning, and at worst introduce pretty much invisible rounding error. It shouldn’t be possible to create the kinds of differences shown in the screen shot from this effect.
  • Does FontForge do different things when exporting an OTF vs TTF? Maybe there is a kern table in the TTF and no GPOS kern feature? Just guessing …
  • samueldurtsamueldurt Posts: 4
    Hello,

    Sorry, I had not noticed that there were answers.
    Maybe I should share it.
  • samueldurtsamueldurt Posts: 4
    edited May 30
    Doesn't work... File format not allowed. OK.
    Does OPM mean EM? Then it's 1000 indeed. For the OTF. I changed it for the True Type.
  • Dave CrosslandDave Crossland Posts: 1,106
    You don't need to change it for the TTF any more :) 
  • John HudsonJohn Hudson Posts: 2,169
    You don't need to change it for the TTF any more

    Or ever. TrueType has always been able to have arbitrary UPM.
Sign In or Register to comment.