Supersized em square
 
            
                
                    Nick Shinn                
                
                    Posts: 2,306                
            
                        
            
I came across this magnificent specimen recently—Sharp Type’s Carta Nueva by My-Lan Thuong, 4096 units to the em—and wondered which other typefaces have ventured into such expansive territory.
0          
            Comments
- 
            The em is a fundamental scale so this actually means the unit is ¹/₄₀₉₆ em.
 0
- 
            Yet another place capitalization matters... :-)
 an em: the unit.
 the Em: the number of units composing the height.
 (Although usage certainly varies.)0
- 
            I use 4000 for hairline fonts
 0
- 
            The linked AIGA article described it thus: “4096 units per em scale”.
 I spose I should have written “4096 units to the em-square”?
 But anyway—other “big em-square” fonts?
 0
- 
            
 u = 1/4096 * mPiotr Grochowski said:The em is a fundamental scale so this actually means the unit is ¹/₄₀₉₆ em.
 is mathematically synonymous with
 u = m/4096
 and
 4096 * u = m
 0
- 
            
 But the em remains constant given the same point size. So this is outline definition precision.Thomas Phinney said:
 u = 1/4096 * mPiotr Grochowski said:The em is a fundamental scale so this actually means the unit is ¹/₄₀₉₆ em.
 is mathematically synonymous with
 u = m/4096
 and
 4096 * u = m
 0
- 
            Nick Shinn said:The linked AIGA article described it thus: “4096 units per em scale”.
 I spose I should have written “4096 units to the em-square”?
 But anyway—other “big em-square” fonts?Gimlet X-Ray has 5000 units per em. 
 3
- 
            What is the main disadvantage of high UPM (let's say above 2000)? I guess font size, but maybe some other things like compatibility with some text processing apps, problems on the web, etc.?0
- 
            If you have a large upm setting and very wide glyphs, it may cause the coordinates to break some systems.
 E.g. if a glyph is 3 em wide, and has a point at x = 12000, and the rasterizer uses an oversampling factor of 5 in x-direction, the coordinate will land at 60000. If the rasterizer should happen to use signed short integer values for calculations, only numbers between -32,768 and 32,767 can be handled. Of course, rasterizers usually don't use the unscaled coordinates, but will scale them to 1/64th pixel first.
 But I think I remember that e.g. Windows could not display a very wide glyph with ClearType. That may be a thing of the past now.6
- 
            Above 4000 unites you get in trouble with Adobe apps. I through that was fixed but were had a case on the forum just recently.6
Categories
- All Categories
- 46 Introductions
- 3.9K Typeface Design
- 485 Type Design Critiques
- 560 Type Design Software
- 1.1K Type Design Technique & Theory
- 654 Type Business
- 853 Font Technology
- 29 Punchcutting
- 519 Typography
- 119 Type Education
- 323 Type History
- 77 Type Resources
- 112 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 33 Lettering Critiques
- 79 Lettering Technique & Theory
- 550 Announcements
- 91 Events
- 114 Job Postings
- 170 Type Releases
- 174 Miscellaneous News
- 276 About TypeDrawers
- 54 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 120 Suggestions and Bug Reports






