Blackletter numerals

George Thomas
Posts: 657
I've never had much of an interest in blackletter types until I came across one from ca. 1860-80 recently. I took a liking to it and researching it led me to a discovery which I cannot find an answer to.
Namely: why did many -- if not all -- American foundries not include design-sensitive numbers in their blackletter fonts in that early era?
I saw numerous examples of blackletter in use with Arabic numbers (frequently oldstyle) but even then there was no consistency in the fonts used. Later on -- mid/late 1870s -- some foundries began to make an attempt to include somewhat design-sensitive numbers but not all were well done.
Any information or opinions are most welcome.
2
Comments
-
Maybe because the focus was on historical and not design sensitivity? AFAIK, Roman numerals had not come into their present form until after the Renaissance, and the printers were probably unsure if they should invent something that might actually have been Latin numerals (I, II, X and so on), or stick to something familiar. Or maybe there were different standards for numerals in the countries that forsake using blackletter and the ones who did not.
I am following this thread.0
Categories
- All Categories
- 46 Introductions
- 3.9K Typeface Design
- 480 Type Design Critiques
- 558 Type Design Software
- 1.1K Type Design Technique & Theory
- 647 Type Business
- 838 Font Technology
- 29 Punchcutting
- 513 Typography
- 119 Type Education
- 319 Type History
- 75 Type Resources
- 110 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 31 Lettering Critiques
- 79 Lettering Technique & Theory
- 540 Announcements
- 88 Events
- 112 Job Postings
- 168 Type Releases
- 171 Miscellaneous News
- 275 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 120 Suggestions and Bug Reports