Cloch

If you make the N more pointy on the bottom-right, the counters will be more balanced. I like the little bit at the top of A, but I think it would be cleaner if it didn't exceed cap-height (like N). Also makes accents a lot easier to implement. The counters of S also need balancing, the top one looks bigger. Does descending the J make sense if it doesn't underneath any previous letter? Ampersand really has unbalanced stroke thickness, and I think a pointier (but still sort of normal) version would work better. I think, for the sake of visual unity, it would be nice if all letters (except for maybe O, I guess) had at least one spur somewhere. The top-left of stems seems the obvious candidate, but something less obvious could well be cooler.

M still looks odd. Can you try the N's treatment on the left, and a more pointy treatment on the right (so that the counters visually align)? J should have less spacing on the left. Actually the spacing seems off in many locations. N still looks odd as well, because the top counter is much larger than the bottom one. The bottom terminals of C and S look a bit unsure.

In your next image, maybe add some words/text?

I agree with Dan. Some letterpairs may need positive kerning, and/or a change of spacing. TT, PO, TH, TL all seem too tight to me. I think you've overdone it on the M and N a little bit. The spur doesn't have to be that big. The bottom terminal of C looks like it's cut off at too much of an angle, the stroke itself seems to follow a more horizontal trajectory. I still think N looks odd, but maybe that's okay. I think it could be wider though. 5's blunt top-left corner looks out of character with the sharpness of the rest to me. &, ?, and @ all look a bit wobbly. & is leaning to the left.