Typeface Dissertation survey

I agree that it's pretty meagre stuff, and doesn't seem very well thought out in terms of what responses might reveal, if anything. I don't think that means it is spam, or someone making fun. I declined to fill in the questionnaire because I could think of too many different ways to qualify responses, none of which the questionnaire provided a way to express. It's a very blunt instrument.

As for the question relating specifically to Gill's sexual activities, we know the record of these stated in his diaries and reported in his biography, and if the purpose of the questionnaire is to gather data about how knowledge of those activities influence people's attitude to using Gill's typefaces, the question would be better if it simply stated that record, rather than colouring it with the unattributed opinion 'Eric Gill is likened to a modern-day Jimmy Savile [sic].' If the point of the questionnaire is to interrogate what people think about Gill's actions, don't tell them what to think.