A solution for Windows Font Viewer 'is not a valid font' error
Shahab Siavash
Posts: 141
Hi,
I've been hearing about this for more than a year now. Some of the users have been telling me that they had received this error before. But I personally never had a problem, until I did search for it and found a lot of users complaining about this. It is a valid font, you install it, no problem, another user with the same OS like Windows 10 tries to install the font and get this error. It never goes away and also doesn't seem to be based on anything. Sometimes it's ttf files, sometimes otf and sometimes totally random.
The tech guys all over the internet finally concluded that it may be related to Windows Firewall! No one knows why and how! But my question is is there any font programmer here that could help me to understand why is this happening and how to fix it? I don't know what should I say to my customers sometimes, they have paid for the fonts. Fonts are working and had been tested, but somehow this happens!
Thanks!
I've been hearing about this for more than a year now. Some of the users have been telling me that they had received this error before. But I personally never had a problem, until I did search for it and found a lot of users complaining about this. It is a valid font, you install it, no problem, another user with the same OS like Windows 10 tries to install the font and get this error. It never goes away and also doesn't seem to be based on anything. Sometimes it's ttf files, sometimes otf and sometimes totally random.
The tech guys all over the internet finally concluded that it may be related to Windows Firewall! No one knows why and how! But my question is is there any font programmer here that could help me to understand why is this happening and how to fix it? I don't know what should I say to my customers sometimes, they have paid for the fonts. Fonts are working and had been tested, but somehow this happens!
Thanks!
Tagged:
0
Comments
-
I've been getting this error before, and I wondered if it was due to something weird in my export config. Sometimes it seemed to have happened when trying to replace an already installed font (Thomas Phinney is right here that the best policy is to uninstall the old version first, otherwise Windows does some magic with the files, it leaves the old file in the directory and copies the new file with changed name, and sometimes puts some weird locks on the files). I think the Firewall clue is probable though, because Windows. I'm curious to know more about the reasons behind this message and ways to avoid it.3
-
Adam Jagosz said:I've been getting this error before, and I wondered if it was due to something weird in my export config. Sometimes it seemed to have happened when trying to replace an already installed font (Thomas Phinney is right here that the best policy is to uninstall the old version first, otherwise Windows does some magic with the files, it leaves the old file in the directory and copies the new file with changed name, and sometimes puts some weird locks on the files). I think the Firewall clue is probable though, because Windows. I'm curious to know more about the reasons behind this message and ways to avoid it.0
-
At least for Windows 7, it refuses to consider an OpenType CFF font valid during installation when the font Family Name is longer than 29 characters.
Though, both of those possible (guessed) names, e.g., "DejaVu Sans Mono Bold Oblique", should just be within limits. The example I gave is exactly 29 characters.3 -
Jeff Kellem said:At least for Windows 7, it refuses to consider an OpenType CFF font valid during installation when the font Family Name is longer than 29 characters.
Though, both of those possible (guessed) names, e.g., "DejaVu Sans Mono Bold Oblique", should just be within limits. The example I gave is exactly 29 characters.
Is it possible that we can find out how Windows Font Viewer actually "consider" a file a valid font? (beside the file name length)0 -
I am confused about something. Under what circumstances would “Bold Oblique” be part of the Family Name? Seems like that would be the style name, unless you are one of those folks who makes every style its own windows family, not even style-linking the italics. That is a bit extreme for my taste.0
-
Jeff Kellem said:At least for Windows 7, it refuses to consider an OpenType CFF font valid during installation when the font Family Name is longer than 29 characters.
Though, both of those possible (guessed) names, e.g., "DejaVu Sans Mono Bold Oblique", should just be within limits. The example I gave is exactly 29 characters.
Family Name <= 31
PS Font Name <= 29
FOND Name <= 30
2 -
I'm only guessing, but maybe Windows font viewer needs Internet access in order to setup digital signature verification for fonts.
From my experience you won't have this issue if you use an external font manager. Our font manager (MainType) comes with a free edition, so do give it a try.
1 -
Erwin Denissen said:I'm only guessing, but maybe Windows font viewer needs Internet access in order to setup digital signature verification for fonts.
From my experience you won't have this issue if you use an external font manager. Our font manager (MainType) comes with a free edition, so do give it a try.0 -
I had a similar problem and it was the cmap table.
1 -
@Peter Constable, can you give any insights into what validation checks Windows does to throw these errors?1
-
Sami Artur Mandelbaum said:I had a similar problem and it was the cmap table.0
-
Shahab Siavash said:Sami Artur Mandelbaum said:I had a similar problem and it was the cmap table.
Have You tried to delet the windows font cache?0 -
Sami Artur Mandelbaum said:Shahab Siavash said:Sami Artur Mandelbaum said:I had a similar problem and it was the cmap table.
Have You tried to delete the windows font cache?0 -
If it’s not something that would go away “with anything a user would do”, but it’s also “not a font-related problem” — then, I’m not sure what you’re hoping for.
0 -
Kent Lew said:If it’s not something that would go away “with anything a user would do”, but it’s also “not a font-related problem” — then, I’m not sure what you’re hoping for.
The reason I'm saying is not font-related because it happens to very very well-known fonts which millions of people already installed them, and the reason I'm saying it's not going away because it's connected to how Windows identifies fonts, and you won't see it on other operating systems (as far as I know).
What I - was - am looking for is to find out how Windows Font Viewer does this "recognition" which ends to this error. I hope I was clear0 -
Shahab Siavash said:Kent Lew said:If it’s not something that would go away “with anything a user would do”, but it’s also “not a font-related problem” — then, I’m not sure what you’re hoping for.
The reason I'm saying is not font-related because it happens to very very well-known fonts which millions of people already installed them, and the reason I'm saying it's not going away because it's connected to how Windows identifies fonts, and you won't see it on other operating systems (as far as I know).
What I - was - am looking for is to find out how Windows Font Viewer does this "recognition" which ends to this error. I hope I was clear
You can try to run your font through OTS first and see whether OTS throws an error. It's very helpful for validating fonts.
1 -
Belleve Invis said:Shahab Siavash said:Kent Lew said:If it’s not something that would go away “with anything a user would do”, but it’s also “not a font-related problem” — then, I’m not sure what you’re hoping for.
The reason I'm saying is not font-related because it happens to very very well-known fonts which millions of people already installed them, and the reason I'm saying it's not going away because it's connected to how Windows identifies fonts, and you won't see it on other operating systems (as far as I know).
What I - was - am looking for is to find out how Windows Font Viewer does this "recognition" which ends to this error. I hope I was clear
You can try to run your font through OTS first and see whether OTS throws an error. It's very helpful for validating fonts.
My point from the beginning was to find out what's the issue with Windows Font Viewer. Obviously I couldn't make it clear enough.0 -
Shahab Siavash said:Belleve Invis said:Shahab Siavash said:Kent Lew said:If it’s not something that would go away “with anything a user would do”, but it’s also “not a font-related problem” — then, I’m not sure what you’re hoping for.
The reason I'm saying is not font-related because it happens to very very well-known fonts which millions of people already installed them, and the reason I'm saying it's not going away because it's connected to how Windows identifies fonts, and you won't see it on other operating systems (as far as I know).
What I - was - am looking for is to find out how Windows Font Viewer does this "recognition" which ends to this error. I hope I was clear
You can try to run your font through OTS first and see whether OTS throws an error. It's very helpful for validating fonts.
My point from the beginning was to find out what's the issue with Windows Font Viewer. Obviously I couldn't make it clear enough.
Current GDI error handler only rejects a font but not reports the reason. For a kernel component like GDI, it is not a bad idea.1 -
To be clear: Windows Font Viewer rejects a font only when GDI rejects it.Shahab Siavash said:Thanks, I will keep this in mind and do that for sure, but yet again it's not about my font or my experience solely, when you search "not a valid font in Windows" you get 122,000,000 results. There are pages on Font.com and Fontsmith,... about this error, so again I don't think it is a font-related problem.
My point from the beginning was to find out what's the issue with Windows Font Viewer. Obviously I couldn't make it clear enough.
Current GDI error handler only rejects a font but not reports the reason. For a kernel component like GDI, it is not a bad idea.
As I mentioned before you got different results from people with the same Windows version.
On top of the frustration that users have to feel, I think this is a very bad publicity for freelance type designers, because the font actually is not corrupt, yet the user can't install it and obviously you can't explain to them that it's a Windows GDI thing, because they paid for a font and they want to use it anyhow.1
Categories
- All Categories
- 43 Introductions
- 3.7K Typeface Design
- 798 Font Technology
- 1K Technique and Theory
- 617 Type Business
- 444 Type Design Critiques
- 541 Type Design Software
- 30 Punchcutting
- 136 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 83 Technique and Theory
- 53 Lettering Critiques
- 483 Typography
- 301 History of Typography
- 114 Education
- 68 Resources
- 498 Announcements
- 79 Events
- 105 Job Postings
- 148 Type Releases
- 165 Miscellaneous News
- 269 About TypeDrawers
- 53 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 116 Suggestions and Bug Reports