Looking at your layouts:
Have you tested any of these layouts or any of this typesetting with your actual users? Unless and until you do that, I don’t see the merit in low-vision persons’ buying your products.
In many ways, this vertical-market type-design forum is incompetently run, such incompetence being buttressed by severely nasty yet endlessly indulged members like Stewf, who himself didn’t do a better job when he was running the place.
And yes, after 26 years online, I do know better. This forum is predicated on the expertise of its members, and some of us have expertise in more than one field.
So again, kids: Which crime is greater – continuously permitting incorrect and intrusive (also lazy) Web-authoring practices or complaining about it and being right? Please make your selection now.
I love how we aren’t just publishing raw, naked URLs anymore – we’re publishing raw, naked shortened URLs.
If only writing the phrase “Typedrawers needs competent administrators” didn’t lead to recriminations levelled against that phrase, and whoever wrote it, rather than correction of the underlying error.
How about “Posts containing http:// or https:// will be placed in the moderation queue,” since those are dead givaways of somebody just dumbly pasting in an URL?
Will Typedrawers ever solve its actual problems?