I was commenting on the weight distribution, as a result of the process he presented, which Ray understood. But then you opined. I was commenting on form and weight. You would have known that had you read, before you went judgmental. You would not have placed an off topic icon (which you have now conveniently deleted) had that been the case.
@Thomas Unduly harsh? Give me a break! How about a myopic, unrelenting demagogue who is the antithesis to an honest dialogue if it is contrary to his beliefs.
If his output was as prolific as his mouth's utterings on the "next wave" of type design I would probably be a bit more understanding. Alas, he is an underachiever. He, without fail, defames the pen and all of its practitioners with vitriol... so he can rot in Typophile for all I care until he allows for multiple approaches to the design of type.
Before you start disliking my comment walk a mile in my shoes. I have been doing what I do for 31 years and he regularly debases what I and others do to earn a living. He refuses to call it by its proper name (just to piss me and others off) and continually derides my profession on Typophile! I jumped ship just to escape his constant BS.