Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

D. Epar ted

About

Username
D. Epar ted
Joined
Visits
2,742
Last Active
Roles
Member, Type Person
Points
591
Invited by
Admin James Puckett
Posts
706
  • Re: TYPO Labs 2018 Berlin, April 12–14

    Not sure what Arabic’s need for a registered xtra axis has to do with Typolab’s curation of presentations? Arabic does not need to give a presentation to say it needs this, or an axis of identical functionality, to be registered. 
  • Re: Council for German Orthography officially allows use of u+1E9E

    "What about W? I_J?" 

    There were already Uppercase V, I and J, when the glyphs W and IJ were added, Nick. 

    There is no uppercase, (or small cap) long S. Adding a "go"-like shape from cyrillic, or a short cap S, (shortened by replacement of the entire bottom with a straight ending), are the suggestions beyond the state recommended use of "SS".


  • Re: Petite Caps, anyone?

    Larger
  • Re: Selling opentype features as separate fonts

    Thomas, maybe "Adobe having no effective interest in helping app developers" would have been more accurate. Sorry. I don't care GX vs OT, never ever did. I only entered that to counter Max wild fantasy. I care type designer, font, typography, user, in whatever the appropriate order is for each project. Your Adobe stridence in a desire to help app developers, always references a lack of top-level adobe support. And you confuse with Unicode talk. Everyone had that bottom up rewrite. Everyone.

    So, regardless of your sometimes heroic acts, 20 years of OT-disappointed users, founders and developers, is the reality. You probably think adobe and MS apps didn't hook up to GX for technical reasons, and that can't be changed. But GX is all still there hooking up to OT just fine. The UI issues, and the font preparation and perpetration issues are only going to go away when all the apps and OS stop trying to be the colossus of nodes, astride the typography of the world. It's over. I mean, we are stuck with some rendering, but the OS, apps, font formats and page description languages, not so much.

    For Jasper, or nearly anyone else, if you are consistent in your sources, your customers will be able to thank you more quickly as you react to their reactions to their feature needs as brought on by the variety of types, apps, OS, pdls and combinations there of.

    Chris "You should not have to bailing wire your efforts to get all the applications in a suite to work together."

    You who? We do. Many of you scream for Victoria. Bailing wire, It's da fewcha o fonts.








  • Re: Selling opentype features as separate fonts

    Thomas, I'm sure we have different experiences with the GX OT vortex, but

    "...right, like it not being a single-platform technology that one company would be unwilling to license to its competitors (GX)."

    GX was implemented at the level of the OS, so all Mac developers could access it evenly, and because that is what each OS "should have done..." MS implements it app by app as well as feature by feature, so no one else ( font founder or app developer ) gets leverage, they say themselves. Adobe had and has no interest in other app developers, until purchased... So, whatever Apple lacked on licensing, which itself is an odd excuse, is I think more than provided for otherwise in OT implementations;) Licensing's odd as an excuse because GX layout and vars were implemented as open tables anyone could develop for on any platform. It's not like the working or the interpretation of an f I ligature or the weight axis need to be licensed. Besides which, if OT was so license able, how'd that work out?

    "...building a better mousetrap ... "

    Real Lessons of GX, that nut and bolts are not enough, and human readable feature names must get all the way from founder to user, not so goodly learned. The web will fix it for those who need it, exactly as in this topic — files and files and more font files, juggling in the background to the tug of software strings that make up for what is missing about families, features and sizes.