If that typeface is released as font software, potentially quite a bit. I would consider an OT Var Garamond to be an advance its digital predecessor. Revivals are a different discussion to modification permissions.How much does yet another digital Garamond really belong to the guy who mostly wrapped outlines around existing ideas?
Font software models software licensing, rather than content tool permissions. How is that misleading? It's a modification clause, typeface and software are linked.Here again positioning typefaces as essentially software is misleading.