That's also not a good idea imho, because if the OFL is one of them, it prohibits redistribution by downstream people "under any other license."Thomas Phinney said:Or, offer the font under the user's choice of several highly permissive licenses.
Rather, that's http://www.wtfpl.net But WTFPL is a terrible idea for serious work, not only because it is inherently unwelcome in important contexts (eg, anything involving kids, and some businesses) but because it is not legally sound (and therefore prohibited in large businesses.)John Hudson said:If you want to allow unrestricted use, the spirit of public domain, use the sil ofl.
Or the fantastically simple and unrestrictive MIT license: the 'do-whatever-the-fuck-you-want' license.