Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!

Kent Lew


Kent Lew
Last Active
Member, Type Person
Invited by
Admin James Puckett
  • Re: Cross-script OpenType feature?

    I should think it would work fine if the rule is registered under DFLT dflt.
  • Re: Is there a need for a TTF version?

    Do very many people actually draw (or correct) their TTFs in quadratics? Don’t most folks just learn to avoid constructions that don’t convert well, convert at time of compilation, cross their fingers, and let it go?

    (Unless you’re specifically working on specialized screen fonts, perhaps.)
  • Re: Fontlab VI messing with my components when generating UFOs

    When a glyph is a component of a component, vfb2ufo tends to remap it to the original component when converting.

    For example, if you have a periodcentered.uc which is a shifted component of periodcentered, and periodcentered is itself a shifted component of period, then upon conversion, the periodcentered.uc will become a component of period (with the coordinates correspondingly recalculated).

    I don’t know why it does this. It isn’t the end of the world, and functionally it is the same (and it’s possible that when it comes time for compilation this same remapping needs to happen anyway; I haven’t investigated). But it can be a nuisance, especially if you aren’t aware of the idiosyncrasy.
  • Re: Maths glyphs in a non-maths font?

    As another example, imagine that Einstein’s famous equation E=mc² is text in an all-italic sidebar. In this typical situation, doesn’t it make more sense for the = symbol to be slanted? Because this is just as likely a usage of = in an italic setting as pure maths, if not more so.
    Here’s a real-world example of such a non-technical setting. (Okay, so it’s not an all-italic sidebar, but same basic idea, I think.)

    From TIME magazine, Nov. 2, 2015:

    Call me old-fashioned, but I just don’t see anything wrong with the unslanted symbol.
  • Re: Question down alignment?

    For a design with really short descenders, I’d probably be inclined to use a cap-alignment approach.

    I agree with Christian, it seems like it would be weird for the questiondown to be vertically compressed relative to the upright one.