Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- All Categories
- 39 Introductions
- 3.6K Typeface Design
- 764 Font Technology
- 1K Technique and Theory
- 587 Type Business
- 435 Type Design Critiques
- 526 Type Design Software
- 30 Punchcutting
- 132 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 79 Technique and Theory
- 53 Lettering Critiques
- 461 Typography
- 289 History of Typography
- 111 Education
- 61 Resources
- 479 Announcements
- 74 Events
- 104 Job Postings
- 147 Type Releases
- 153 Miscellaneous News
- 259 About TypeDrawers
- 52 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 109 Suggestions and Bug Reports
Options
Family name
Ofir Shavit
Posts: 396
Hi
I'm creating a large family of fonts and wonder what is the best way to name the members so they'll stick together and be as compact as possible?
I'm using FontForge to generate the OTF files, and wish to mark the font weights with numbers i.e. 100, 200, 300, etc'
The general family structure is:
Font name, Style (Regular/Rounded/Narrow/Wide/Italic/Angular/etc'), Weight (100, 200, 300, 400, 500, etc')
I might have one font with 5 weights of the Regular style, 5 weights of the Narrow and Italic styles and wish they'll all stick together in windows and Mac folders and software menus
Any suggestions?
Thanks
I'm creating a large family of fonts and wonder what is the best way to name the members so they'll stick together and be as compact as possible?
I'm using FontForge to generate the OTF files, and wish to mark the font weights with numbers i.e. 100, 200, 300, etc'
The general family structure is:
Font name, Style (Regular/Rounded/Narrow/Wide/Italic/Angular/etc'), Weight (100, 200, 300, 400, 500, etc')
I might have one font with 5 weights of the Regular style, 5 weights of the Narrow and Italic styles and wish they'll all stick together in windows and Mac folders and software menus
Any suggestions?
Thanks
0
Comments
What a mess...
Can anyone draw the lines between the Fontlab dialog names fields and the Fontforge's?
Attached an image with Orange marks to make it easier
And what if I don't wish to use the "Book, Semibold, Bold, Black, etc'" names and use only numeric indications for the weights (100, 200, 300...)?
The TTF Names in FontForge are the OpenType specs’ name IDs from OpenType Specifications - The Naming table (see the Name IDs table).
"Family" is name ID 1, "Styles (Subfamily)" is name ID 2, "Preferred Family" is name ID 16, "Preferred Style" is name ID 17, etc as they are described in the specs.
So, in your image:
TTF 4 = FL 1,
TTF 5 = FL 2,
TTF 1 = FL 3,
TTF 3 = FL 7.
The PS Names are
Fontname = PS name
Family name = OT Name ID 1
Name For Humans = OT Name ID 4 (TTF Names: "Fullname")
Weight = OT Name ID 2 (TTF Names: "Styles (Subfamily)")
So, in your image:
PS 1 = FL 8,
PS 2 = TTF 4 = FL 1,
PS 3 = TTF 3 = FL 7,
PS 4 = TTF 2 = FL 4.
The main issue is grouping font families in groups of 4 for Name ID 1 and 2 (Family and Style) for the Windows platform.
The Name ID 16 and 17 (Preferred Family and Preferred Style) allow for more members in a family.
Another set of names were added to the OpenType specs more recently.
Name ID 21 and 22 (WWS Family and WWS Style) can be used for other style variation than weight, width, slant (WWS), like if you want your Rounded, Angular, Caption, etc. styles to have the same name ID 16 as the other styles.
I'll start another session of experimenting
TTF3 = FL9
TTF2 = FL7
PS2 = TTF1 = FL3
PS3 = TTF3 = FL9
PS4 = TTF2 = FL7
What's weird is that there's no straight way to defing a font's weight with FontForge since the PS weight (PS4) is actually the Sabfamily (TTF2)!?
I wonder if the basic 4 family members limitation is just a quantity limitation or the restriction is for using the standard names as well (regular, italic, bold, bold italic )? If I'll use 4 other styles like - Tall, short, wide, narrow, would it work as well or should I use the ID16/17 for these variations?
If you have a big family, and you are not comfortable/familiar with the issues, and you can afford it, you might consider just using FontLab's TransType 4 to fix the family relationship issues. It is very good for this task.
I still wish to understand and control FF's functionality and how to achieve with it my basic needs and didn't get there yet.
What kind of diagram do you mean?
I know what I want to do and the result I wish to get.
I'm creating the following OTF font family:
Family: Nigella
Styles:
Regular. weights: 100, 300, 500, 700, 900
Condensed. weights: 100, 300, 500, 700, 900
Rounded. weights: 100, 300, 500, 700, 900
Angular. weights: 100, 300, 500, 700, 900
Wide. weights: 100, 300, 500, 700, 900
Most simple, 20 members in total
I wish they'll stick together in Windows, Mac and main popular applications
For example, in the PS Character dialog this family will be presented like:
Under Nigella
Regular 100
Regular 300
Regular 500
Regular 700
Regular 900
Condensed 100
Condensed 300
Condensed 500
etc'
Rounded 100
etc'
Angular 100
etc'
Wide 100
etc'
Why so?
Because GDI applications can't handle more than the core 4 styles per family. On Windows that's what nameIDs 1 and 2 are for, nameIDs 16 and 17 can have more than 4 styles.
Personally I would only stick the angular and rounded subfamilies into separate typographic families, and put the regular, wide and condensed ones together. But that's just my preference.
Can anyone please try and see what's wrong with the fonts attached?
4 fonts I try to gather to a family with no luck
Family name is Agent
and there are 4 weights, thin, light, medium & bold
I'm using FontForge and tried various combinations of styles and weights and names and you name it, and I don't mind to change the weight/style name as long as they'll stick together in my Windows Fonts directory and show up under the same family name in PS and other software, right now only 2-3 of them show up, other are hidden and or displayed with unintended names.
First of all, you've got four different weights. For Windows, you can have at most two weights in a family (two roman, two italic), technically regular and bold, but they don't literally need to be "regular" and "bold".
This all happens in name table entries 1 and 2. Name table entry 1 is the "Family Name", name table 2 is the "Style Name". Only two roman (non-italic) fonts can have the same "Family Name" for name table entry 1. In your fonts, you've got four roman fonts with the same "Family Name", "Agent". Not only that, none of your fonts is called either "Agent" or "Agent Regular". To avoid confusion, and to make it so that they all show up in Windows font menus, I would just skip the whole regular/bold thing and enter them under four different family names for name table entry 1:
Agent Bold
Agent Medium
Agent Thin
Agent Light
Name table entry 2 can only be one of four things: "Regular", "Italic", "Bold", or "Bold Italic". No other possibilities will work. The entries you have ("700", "_medium", "_thin", and "500") will not work.
None of your fonts are italic, and we're not using bold (see above). That leaves "Regular" for all of them. Name table entry 2 for all four fonts will be "Regular".
Regular
Regular
Regular
Regular
Name table entry 3 is the "Full Name". Usually, this is entry 1 combined with entry 2. However, if the style is "Regular", then it's identical to entry 1. So, for name table entry 3, enter the same as name table 1:
Agent Bold
Agent Medium
Agent Thin
Agent Light
Name table entry 6 is the "PostScript Name". This is normally the family name + a hyphen + the style name. The preceding entries are only used by simple Windows apps like Office. Other apps, can use more than two weights. So for this, we can use "Agent" as the family name and the weight names for the style name. Also: only letters and one hyphen are allowed, and the hyphen must be between the two parts--no underscores, like you used. So, for name table 5:
Agent-Bold
Agent-Medium
Agent-Thin
Agent-Light
All of this goes for both platform 1 (Windows) and platform 3 (Mac). There are a set of name table entries for each.
For the next two entries, only include them for platform 1 (Windows). They are not needed for Mac because the Windows entries are also used there in every case that matters.
Name table entry 16 is the "OpenType Family Name". This is the same as what you used for the family name in entry 6:
Agent
Agent
Agent
Agent
Finally, name table entry 17 is the "OpenType Style Name". This is the same as the second part in entry 6:
Bold
Medium
Thin
Light
That's it. However, if your font is CFF OpenType (and yours are), then make sure the CFF table has the right stuff too:
- Font name should be the same as entry 6, the "PostScript Name"
- FullName should be the same as entry 3, the "Full Name"
- FamilyName should be the same as entry 1, the "Family Name"
- Weight should be the same as entry 6, the "OpenType Family Name" (Note: weight only, don't add "Italic" if it's italic)
Finally, you've got "100" as the weight value for your Thin weight. This will kind of work, but it's better not to use a value below "250", otherwise Windows may do a fake bold thing to it.
That should do it. Good luck.
(Note to others reading this: I may have left out some stuff that applies to larger families.)
Although I may be a bit biased, I strongly believe that DTL OTMaster (download manual) is the most convenient tool for checking and editing .otf and .ttf fonts.
There is/was also a need (is it still necessary?) for CFF OpenType fonts (.otf) to have ID4 Windows be the same as ID6 Windows.
I don’t recall now the exact reasoning or conditions under which this made a difference, but it is part of Karsten’s recommendations and is the reason for FontLab’s preference checkbox “Use Postscript FontName [ID6] as FullName [ID4] on Windows” in the Generating OpenType PS (.otf) section.
On the last point, there's this from Read Roberts on the OpenType mailing list from Nov. 30, 2010: So, it's no longer necessary. He does point out that you probably don't want to change it for already released fonts as that can cause problems on some versions of Windows if the new version of a font is installed over an old one that followed the old rule. On the other hand, following the old rule causes cross platform document compatibility problems with Word 2011 for Mac.
- ID1, ID2 and ID4 Mac need to match ID1, ID2 and ID4 Win.
- Use ID1 + ID2 for ID4, but abbreviate to keep it under 32 characters (e.g., It or Ital instead of Italic). Don't need to use CFF PS Name as ID4 Win anymore.
- Don't include "Regular" as part of the ID4 name ("Italic", "Bold", and "Bold Italic" are okay if they apply).
- Include ID16 and ID17 for Win only.
- Don't include ID18.
- ID1, ID2, ID4, ID16, ID17 all need to be less than 32 characters, even though spec says <64 for ID4.
- ID6 needs to be less than 30 characters.
That's about it, as I currently understand it.
‘[…] I learned most of this from Adam Twardoch […]’
I could be completely wrong, but the 32 character limitation you mention for ID4 and the 30 character limit for ID6 are against the specs and seem to me more related to the internal handling (i.e., the way the AFDKO is invoked) by FLS than anything else. I prefer to use ID18 for Mac for the 32 character limit for applications that cannot handle longer names. Never had troubles with >32 character names for ID4 and ID6 so far. This only requires some editing of the naming tables (also the CFF one, of course) in OTM after generating in FM.
And now another glass of a fine Bordeaux!
If you (or anyone) know better, I'm all ears.
Cheers!