Changes To Reactions Redux

2»

Comments

  • Chris LozosChris Lozos Posts: 1,132
    Much ado about not much when it comes to flags. I really don't pay much attention to them.
  • joeclarkjoeclark Posts: 123

    In many ways, this vertical-market type-design forum is incompetently run, such incompetence being buttressed by severely nasty yet endlessly indulged members like Stewf, who himself didn’t do a better job when he was running the place.

    And yes, after 26 years online, I do know better. This forum is predicated on the expertise of its members, and some of us have expertise in more than one field.

    So again, kids: Which crime is greater – continuously permitting incorrect and intrusive (also lazy) Web-authoring practices or complaining about it and being right? Please make your selection now.

  • Personally I pay zero attention to the flags. They are all popular-based flags...with the exception of flagging abuse that is actually abuse. 

    Mike
  • Personally I don’t mind the flags, but I wonder if, for the sake of simplicity, professionalism, and to encourage actual dialog instead of just reactions, all the flags except for Abuse and Quote should just be done away with? I’m part of other forums that do this and it works great from what I can tell.
  • Hrant H. PapazianHrant H. Papazian Posts: 1,349
    edited April 24
    So this has been on my mind on-and-off, but today it has really hit home:
    http://typedrawers.com/discussion/comment/40773/#Comment_40773

    Editing can actually completely reverse the meaning of a post, leaving people who did an Agree unduly maligned (although this case was not nearly so extreme).

    I can't think of an elegant and robust way of making sure people's flags don't become contradictory when a post is edited. But it should at least be mentioned somewhere prominent that we shouldn't assume a flag is in fact what the flagger feels, due to possible post-editing. Which however makes the purpose of flags a bit weak... Ideally, some sort of time-stamping should be easily visible and/or moderators should have an easy way of resetting the flags.
  • Vasil StanevVasil Stanev Posts: 325
    edited April 24
    Just wait until I am finished editing and/or the post is more than 4 hours old... is it that hard? I like to refine my posts to value everybodies time, it's just how I do it. I don't use a text editor for it, it's not the National Archive.
  • Hrant H. PapazianHrant H. Papazian Posts: 1,349
    edited April 24
    I also do a lot of editing, although mostly for style. It feels unkosher to change a post substantially after people might have read it.

    I think you've hit on something potentially promising: no flags until the 4-hour editing window closes. It's quite elegant, and additionally can help people cool off.
  • Russell_McGormanRussell_McGorman Posts: 188
    edited April 24
    I can be 97% certain that I won't read a post before it's 4 days old. No worries here. :)
  • Vasil StanevVasil Stanev Posts: 325

    I think you've hit on something potentially promising: no flags until the 4-hour editing window closes. It's quite elegant, and additionally can help people cool off.
    Sounds reasonable...
  • Hrant H. PapazianHrant H. Papazian Posts: 1,349
    edited May 10
    Is it OK for somebody to deploy an Abuse flag here?
    http://typedrawers.com/discussion/comment/41226/#Comment_41226
    Presumed personal dislike should not be allowed to foster a toxic environment.

    I hope the moderators are serious about implementing consequences for abusive flagging.
    #4: http://typedrawers.com/discussion/751/read-this-first-the-typedrawers-rules

  • Tiffany WardleTiffany Wardle Posts: 228
    @Hrant H. Papazian You would like us to flag your comment?
  • Frode Frode Posts: 102
    I flagged you for being off topic, Hrant. 
  • Hrant H. PapazianHrant H. Papazian Posts: 1,349
    edited May 10
    @Tiffany Wardle What comment, and for what reason?
    Frode said:
    I flagged you for being off topic, Hrant. 
    We can [dis]agree on whether it was off-topic, but the Abuse flag is for "serious purposes". Just because the Off-Topic flag was removed does not mean we should trivialize victims of real abuse. Words matter.

    Please don't flag Claudio for abuse, whether you like him or not:
    http://typedrawers.com/discussion/comment/41242/#Comment_41242
  • Tiffany WardleTiffany Wardle Posts: 228
    @Frode Bo Helland (inactive) I guess I don't see exactly how off topic Hrant's comment really is. Isn't it tangential? 

    I do not like flags. I see they are necessary for serious situations, but I do not think they should be used when someone comments with something which might be interesting if only tangentially.
  • Frode Frode Posts: 102
    edited May 10
    Hrant’s comment concerns his ideas for drawing an italic face – the conversation concerns a technical font file setting controlling the position of the blue background you get when selecting text. Constant off-topic comments may not be strictly abusive, but they certainly hinder any conversation anyone else is trying to have.
  • Tiffany WardleTiffany Wardle Posts: 228
    Perhaps what we need is just an off-topic flag instead of using the abuse flag? Is it so difficult to just ignore comments that are not on topic? (An innocent question, not flaming you.) There was someone on Typophile that, in the end, became super annoying to me. So I simply ignored all of their comments. If we spend our lives expending energy on people that annoy us we will have no energy for the people who are important to us.
  • Frode Frode Posts: 102
    An off-topic flag would be great. I try to ignore – not always successfully.
  • Hrant H. PapazianHrant H. Papazian Posts: 1,349
    edited May 11
    In fact my post was tangential at worst. And some people value tangents as enriching; we should not be fascist about how people choose to experience public discourse.

    But to me that is off-topic here, because the point is:
    Perhaps what we need is just an off-topic flag instead of using the abuse flag?
    Off-Topic and Abuse flags can both be useful. But no matter what flags are [not] available, it's very important –if "subvisible"– for moderators to rein in people who abuse flags, lest those they choose to constantly target* become too tempted to stoop to their level and retaliate (FYI, I never would) creating a toxic environment.

    *  Seven of the nine abuse flags I've received come from two people (the other two are from a deleted account).
  • Thomas PhinneyThomas Phinney Posts: 1,403
    If we could but practice more moderation in our lives, perhaps we would not need moderators. (Not a proverb.)
    It is now!

    T
  • Hrant H. PapazianHrant H. Papazian Posts: 1,349
    If we could but practice more moderation in our lives, perhaps we would not need moderators. (Not a proverb.)
    As Ray implies, this also applies to flagging.

    If we do need moderators, we need them to mind that too.
    http://typedrawers.com/discussion/comment/40815/#Comment_40815
Sign In or Register to comment.