TypeDrawers
Discussions
Activity
Best Of...
Sign In
Home
›
Type Design Software
Sign In
·
Register
Howdy, Stranger!
It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.
Sign In
Register
Quick Links
Categories
Recent Discussions
Activity
Best Of...
Categories
All Categories
39
Introductions
3.6K
Typeface Design
763
Font Technology
1K
Technique and Theory
586
Type Business
434
Type Design Critiques
526
Type Design Software
30
Punchcutting
132
Lettering and Calligraphy
79
Technique and Theory
53
Lettering Critiques
458
Typography
287
History of Typography
111
Education
60
Resources
479
Announcements
74
Events
104
Job Postings
147
Type Releases
153
Miscellaneous News
258
About TypeDrawers
52
TypeDrawers Announcements
109
Suggestions and Bug Reports
Glitches in FL5, not in MS Word
Ori Ben-Dor
Posts:
383
March 2017
in
Type Design Software
This is the same glyph (from Facto Bold, a Jonathan Hill of The Northern Block typeface).
Note the glitches seen only in FL5.
What's going on here?
(Technical details: I'm using Windows 10, the file type is OTF.)
0
Comments
Georg Seifert
Posts:
669
March 2017
The font/glyph uses fractional coordinates and FLS can’t handle them correctly.
1
Ori Ben-Dor
Posts:
383
March 2017
Wait a minute, fractional coordinates are legal?
You haven't changed your mind about making Glyphs available for Windows, have you?
0
Ori Ben-Dor
Posts:
383
March 2017
@Thomas Phinney
Is it going to be any different in FLVI?
0
John Hudson
Posts:
2,955
March 2017
Yes, fractional coordinates are legit now (although not recommended unless you need them, since they increase font file size), and yes, they are supported in FLVI.
2
Ori Ben-Dor
Posts:
383
March 2017
Good to know, thanks.
0
Adam Twardoch
Posts:
507
March 2017
Ps. Fractional coordinates work in CFF-flavored OT fonts only but not in TTF-flavored fonts.
3
Sign In
or
Register
to comment.
Forum Software Powered by Vanilla
Comments
You haven't changed your mind about making Glyphs available for Windows, have you?
Is it going to be any different in FLVI?