Paramond — an extreme display serif

14567810»

Comments

  • "Mix (2.) and (3.)" When I started out with Proza, I was overambitious and actually wanted to do something like that, creating a superfamily of different weights and 5 different degrees of contrast. I'm glad I didn't go through with it. Better to focus on one of the two, and keep the other as a possibility for later. If I were you, I'd focus on either the moderate or zero contrast design. A high-contrast sans-serif can teach you a lot, but is extremely hard to get right.
  • Christian ThalmannChristian Thalmann Posts: 723
    edited June 2016
    Jasper, I agree that starting out with a superfamily in mind is probably a recipe for disaster (or at least an early forfeit).

    I'll try out a moderate-contrast design between the two previous takes to see what it would look like. I think a zero-contrast design will never work, unless I stick to weights of 20 units or less...

    I can see that a high-contrast sans comes with its share of challenges, but I'm not seeing any showstoppers at this point... in fact, among the quick demo samples I showed earlier, the high-contrast ones felt quite compelling to me out of the box, whereas the low-contrast ones strike me as crude and uninspired. (Come to think of it, most of my previous typefaces are high-contrast designs, so maybe I'm predisposed.)

    I also agree with you that the visual quality drops with increasing weight, and that it's probably a good idea to drop the Black weight (unless it came with some drastic reshaping, as with Bély Display...?). Even in Proza, I find the lightest weights have a distinguished rhythm and elegance that diminishes somewhat in the heavies (presumably by sheer inevitability).
  • Hrant H. PapazianHrant H. Papazian Posts: 298
    edited June 2016
    Even in Proza, I find the lightest weights have a distinguished rhythm and elegance that diminishes somewhat in the heavies (presumably by sheer inevitability).
    This might relate to something potentially big that hit me recently:


  • Experimenting with contrast grades. For some reason, the highest and lowest contrasts feel the most coherent to me in this view. However, when I see the lowest-contrast sample in isolation, it looks crude to me.

    I don't actually mind the white color of the high-contrast /E much. Tabac Glam pulls it off successfully, too. I tried flaring the horizontals a little in the heavy weights, but then the whole /E starts to look sad.
  • She's your baby. If the high-contrast version looks better to you, just go with it.
  • If only it were that simple. :pensive: My perceptions shift to and fro. For instance, I like the fact that the low-contrast versions look very convincing at small sizes:
     
    Maybe I should just bite the sour apple and make one high-contrast and one low-contrast version. If they share the Hairline master and forego heavy weights, I could get away with «only» three masters...  plus the Italics... and the high/low masters can build on each other, so they don't take twice as much work as sticking to only one of the two...  then again, this sound dangerously like compromising for the sake of convenience.

    Dammit, it seems I'm past the blissful days of single-weight projects. :disappointed:
  • Christian ThalmannChristian Thalmann Posts: 723
    edited June 2016
    I'm also not sure whether chipping away at the shoulders and heels is an improvement or not... sure, it helps the poor /d, but doesn't it also reduce the overall solidity a bit...?

    (BTW, I widened the /a a bit more. Although the super-narrow /a is a trademark feature of the lighter weights of Garamond, I think it can't really get away with it in the heavier weights.)
  • PabloImpallariPabloImpallari Posts: 483
    edited June 2016
    Testing different grades & widths & weights & contrast & all that stuff is always super cool, but you must do so with a target size-range in mind, or a target use-case.

    What looks best for body text (14 or 16px) will look like a horse at huge sizes (180px), and what looks super nice at huge sizes will look all jammed and pressed at text sizes.

    Of your previous 5 options, they all look good, but each for a different purpose.
    Basically if you add a little bit of spacing and width to the mix, you end up having multiple masters families like Adobe's display, deck, text & caption series.
  • Christian ThalmannChristian Thalmann Posts: 723
    edited June 2016
    I should probably also stop using a Bold weight to make these decisions — after all, Garamond itself shines in Regular, and suffers a Bold only by neccessity.  :grimace:

    As a test, I've adopted the low-contrast Bold as my second master, kept the clipped-off heels, and added some bracket-trick intermediates to keep the contrast from growing too quickly at low weights. It doesn't look as crude as I had feared.

    Pablo: Since the Hairline is my starting point, I guess my primary goal is something that looks good at display sizes. However, if the small-print test above is any indication, this low-contrast approach could make for a decent text face (especially for the modern-day text use, i.e. 15+ pt on a retina screen). If I end up making a high-contrast version as well, that would almost certainly be for display sizes only. I will probably never make anything optimized for small sizes and bad resolution because that sounds like a lot of work and compromises. :grimace:

  • Time for a new thread, no?
  • Congrats on the new release, Christian! That italic /de-cy is always a royal pain to get right.
  • Yep! :grimace: Cyrillic is harder than it looks...

    BTW, here's a little «stealth change» I made to the Garamond style of Cormorant along with the flashier stuff... the counters of /A and /R are now more relaxed to match the more relaxed counters in /a and /e. That /R has been bugging me for a while in Garamond settings. Oh, and I got rid of that inexplicably odious foot on the lining /seven. What was I thinking...?



  • Yep! :grimace: Cyrillic is harder than it looks...

    BTW, here's a little «stealth change» I made to the Garamond style of Cormorant along with the flashier stuff... the counters of /A and /R are now more relaxed to match the more relaxed counters in /a and /e. That /R has been bugging me for a while in Garamond settings. Oh, and I got rid of that inexplicably odious foot on the lining /seven. What was I thinking...?




    I really wish that you can do a “Text” version alongside the current Garamond. I’m currently typesetting my paper using a modified version of it.
  • Well, Cormorant was intended as a display companion to traditional Garamonds (like EB Garamond), so it seems unnecessarily cyclical to make a text companion to Cormorant now.  :grimace:  Then again, Cormorant does have its individual character now, and I do admit the thought has crossed my mind.

    Making Eau de Garamond as a sans companion to the Garamonds (including Cormorant) is my first priority right now. I'm getting the impression that Eau will be surprisingly capable as a text font, so you could always use that for your paper. :grin:

    (Perhaps if enough people were interested in a Cormorant Text typeface, though, Google Fonts might be convinced to fund it...? :wink:)
Sign In or Register to comment.