Howdy, Stranger!
Categories
- All Categories
- 39 Introductions
- 3.6K Typeface Design
- 764 Font Technology
- 1K Technique and Theory
- 589 Type Business
- 435 Type Design Critiques
- 527 Type Design Software
- 30 Punchcutting
- 132 Lettering and Calligraphy
- 79 Technique and Theory
- 53 Lettering Critiques
- 461 Typography
- 289 History of Typography
- 111 Education
- 61 Resources
- 479 Announcements
- 74 Events
- 104 Job Postings
- 147 Type Releases
- 153 Miscellaneous News
- 259 About TypeDrawers
- 52 TypeDrawers Announcements
- 109 Suggestions and Bug Reports
Options
Tweak CFF hinting after font file has been produced
Roel Nieskens
Posts: 187
I'm investigating why some OTF fonts render fuzzy on Windows 7. A TTF version looks crisp, yet OTF is rendered a little fatter.
I know DirectWrite on these older Windows has it's problems, but I want to see if there's anything I can influence in the font itself to make it look a little better. Playing with the "blue values" in the generated font doesn't seem to make any visual difference (admittedly I only just now learned about them so this might be obvious). Are these only used while generating the font and simply stored as metadata? I understand CFF hinting is done in the rasteriser, but is there anything you can influence from the font itself?
I know DirectWrite on these older Windows has it's problems, but I want to see if there's anything I can influence in the font itself to make it look a little better. Playing with the "blue values" in the generated font doesn't seem to make any visual difference (admittedly I only just now learned about them so this might be obvious). Are these only used while generating the font and simply stored as metadata? I understand CFF hinting is done in the rasteriser, but is there anything you can influence from the font itself?
0
Comments
> I'm investigating why some OTF fonts render fuzzy on Windows 7.
Only some? If so, it may be that they are unhinted? Or could you be seeing different behaviors in different apps, depending on which Windows rendering API they use?
> I understand CFF hinting is done in the rasteriser
No, normally Windows 7 uses the hints in the font.
That said, CFF hints are much simpler than TTF instructions, and hence you are more limited in how you can affect that rendering. Also, the rasterization model used for CFF on Windows 7 is just less sophisticated than (no ClearType applied).
Mostly, you can either hint major strokes, or not. Unhinted outlines will render more fuzzy on Windows 7, if I recall correctly.
You could also use Vstem and Hstem values to tell the rasterizer what the primary stroke thicknesses are in the font and aid rendering. You could "lie" about these numbers and make them a bit lighter than the real numbers. I doubt it's worth it. With CFF on Win 7, this would likely mostly affect rendering at relatively large sizes. We are talking full pixels here for stroke thickness and hinting. So most likely
Blue Values are used to determine where to enforce overshoot control (at lowish ppem sizes). Nothing to do with "fuzziness."
To clarify, I was looking at fonts used as webfonts in Internet Explorer, not in other apps.