Home› History of Typography
Options

You start blogging about fonts and this is what happens

Mark SimonsonMark Simonson Posts: 1,654
in History of Typography
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MqOz8-Sto1g

I wonder who they cast for Thomas Phinney?

Comments

  • Options
    Peiran TanPeiran Tan Posts: 22
    This looks like The Newsroom’s Genoa (Season 2) just got a feature-length revival.
  • Options
    Craig EliasonCraig Eliason Posts: 1,398
    @Nick Shinn you beat me to it!
  • Options
    Chris LozosChris Lozos Posts: 1,458
    They will cast Adrian Monk as Thomas ;-P
  • Options
    Mark SimonsonMark Simonson Posts: 1,654
    Well, I'm going to see the movie today. It'll be interesting to find out whether they mention more than "bloggers".
  • Options
    Thomas PhinneyThomas Phinney Posts: 2,748
    I've read the book it is based on, and have written a blog post. Just waiting to see the movie as well. Probably tomorrow.

    The “analysis” of the memos in the book is simplistic with straw man arguments. There are many, many references to the rabid, right-wing extremist bloggers who weighed in against the memos—and that is the kind of language Mapes uses about them, over and over. Ad hominem attacks everywhere (but how dare anyone question whether her politics might have influenced her coverage).

    Aside from the logical fallacies surrounding her tunnel vision on the memos, Mapes does make a convincing case that the main thrust of the story was accurate and well supported, and a bit of outside research says the same. So the central concern of the book, that questioning the memos should not have led to ignoring the story, seems valid.
  • Options
    Mark SimonsonMark Simonson Posts: 1,654
    edited November 2015
    After seeing the movie, I'd say it's not unlike how you describe the book. And those of us who wrote about it on forums at the time are just "bloggers" in the movie. Although I think they quoted someone at length at one point, reading off a website.
  • Options
    James PuckettJames Puckett Posts: 1,970
    I wonder how many historians are angry that Typophile disappeared.
  • Options
    Mark SimonsonMark Simonson Posts: 1,654
    A lot of the discussion I remember happened here: http://typographica.org/on-typography/forensic-typography-and-the-2004-campaign/
  • Options
    Mark SimonsonMark Simonson Posts: 1,654
    edited November 2015
    Unfortunately, a lot of the links in that discussion have rotted away. A key one can still be found on the Internet Archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20041010151012/http://www.typophile.com/forums/messages/30/48638.html?1095370337
  • Options
    Mark SimonsonMark Simonson Posts: 1,654
    edited November 2015
    Also, for what it's worth, I thought Redford did a pretty good Rather. I kind of forgot he was Redford while I was watching it. No pun intended, but a rather amazing performance.
  • Options
    Thomas PhinneyThomas Phinney Posts: 2,748
    edited November 2015
    Thomas Phinney said:

    The “analysis” of the memos in the book is simplistic with straw man arguments. 

    See: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

    Specifically, Mapes’ logic boils down to: proportional spacing was available in some typewriters at the time, therefore criticizing the memos as forgeries based on their proportional spacing is partisan nonsense. This Ignores the fact that the particular spacing of the memos was not physically possible with typewriter-level technology of the period, which is why every typewriter anyone has identified from the period as a candidate, to date, has been specifically disproven.

    Same thing with superscript: argues that because superscript existed on some typewriters, criticizing the particular superscript of the memos is wrong.

    But the savvy critiques are not making the arguments she claims.
  • Options
    Chris LozosChris Lozos Posts: 1,458
    Kind of like blaming the ruler for the measurement.
  • Options
    joeclarkjoeclark Posts: 122
    I do not understand this thread.
  • Options
    Mark SimonsonMark Simonson Posts: 1,654
    Do you mean you don't understand what we're talking about, or that you don't understand why we're talking about it?
  • Options
    Chris LozosChris Lozos Posts: 1,458
    Joe, look back a few years at the W Bush controversy over his military service and the "document" which indicated he was not truthful. Thomas Phinney, in his font scene investigator role, was hired to evaluate the validity of the document. Thomas can speak to this far better than my geezer memory.

Sign In or Register to comment.