Which one do you suggest as the first typeface for someone starting to become serious about type design?
To give more context, here in Iran we have about 10-20 old typefaces, with poor digital versions: only two weights, small character sets, no OpenType features, even some non-smooth curves, ...
I also have idea for new types, but I know turning an idea into a real typeface is not that straightforward.
What do you guys suggest? Making a brand new typeface or reviving one of the old types into a full-featured type family?
I'm also not sure about legal terms concerning revivals. Can I just pick any typeface I want and build a revival version of it?
0
Comments
That said, it can be instructive to do a revival. If nothing else, it will get you familiar with the tools. I have made revivals that I've never released that I did mainly for learning new font software. It can help you get used to what a font looks like in a font editor. Very often, novices (me too when I started) will make the spacing too tight or not know how different things look in actual usage. It can help to open existing fonts to see how they are built, but don't use existing digital fonts as a starting point. You will probably be violating copyright.
You can refine your skills later, but you are only fresh once.
You will bite off more than you can chew if you dive straight in at the deep end.
A lot of us got started with grunge/deconstruction in the early 1990s.
The designer of Gotham was 21 when his first face was published.
I was a bit older, but my first digital design was also a bit wonky, Fontesque.
Another genre that can provide good results with novice skills is techno, type reduced to basic geometrics.
Look to posters and street art for inspiration.
It’s a short distance from vernacular to relevance.