Hi there, In the coming months I will re-design my website and I would like to know if there is an Open Source or commercial Font Tester out there you can recommend? I'd rather not choose rented systems like the one offered by P. Bilak. I remember I saw one in the past but I can't find it anymore. TIA.
BTW: The interface does fool me. The actual lines say »Click to change (the font)«, so I click them and expect to be able to change the text. Then I even see a selection there and - again - expect to be able to type to overwrite that selection. But it doesn't work. I am supposed to use the smaller input field above.
It would probably be more intuitive to make the texts itself changeable.
You are supposed to click to change the font, that is how our whole webpage is built at the moment. It’s main purpose is to show all our fonts.
Above there is a box: "Type here..."
But I’m also thinking of updating it to something similar as http://www.mckltype.com/retail/fort/ which I think is an even smoother way of changing both text and fonts.
Sure, I figured it out after a while. It just didn't behave the way I expected it. If it's live web type anyway, than that MCKL way should be no problem. Having an additional input box was only necessary for bitmap renderings.
In short: - Convert the PS-outlines to TT-outlines - TT-Hinting (Manual or Half-manual depending of the type of use) - Stripping OT-features if necessary - Remove some of the least important kerning pairs to save file size
Just to let you know, guys that Pablo Impallari programmed for me a custom Font Tester with full OT coverage. Warning: It makes use of webfonts (my account in Fontdeck was very useful). But It works and well.
Thanks Ramiro for commissioning this fun little project! It was my pleasure to play around with Medusa.
Latest Firefox and Chrome: Full support. Tested. Latest Safari: Only kern, liga and calt at this moment. Tested. (Hopefully more in the future) Latest IE10: Full support, at least in theory. Not yet tested.
His main concern was to have 'kern', 'liga' and 'calt' turned on. So, we are covered on that ones.
Comments
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Insightful Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Insightful Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Insightful Disagree Agree LikeReal type rendering in the browser is certainly the way to go in the future.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Insightful Disagree Agree LikeAnyway, they are offered in Fontdeck, Myfonts and Fontshop.
@Ralf: What I don't like about the Type-Applications tester is that it is a renting scheme (and also you must use iframes)
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Insightful Disagree Agree LikeWe have a super simple solution for this, but you could also make the OT-features available.
http://lettersfromsweden.se/typetester
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Insightful Disagree Agree LikeThe actual lines say »Click to change (the font)«, so I click them and expect to be able to change the text. Then I even see a selection there and - again - expect to be able to type to overwrite that selection. But it doesn't work. I am supposed to use the smaller input field above.
It would probably be more intuitive to make the texts itself changeable.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Insightful Disagree Agree LikeAbove there is a box: "Type here..."
But I’m also thinking of updating it to something similar as http://www.mckltype.com/retail/fort/
which I think is an even smoother way of changing both text and fonts.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Insightful Disagree Agree LikeIf it's live web type anyway, than that MCKL way should be no problem. Having an additional input box was only necessary for bitmap renderings.
If anyone is wondering how that that text scaling is done in Göran’s last link. That's “BigText”. I wrote an article about it a while ago: http://opentype.info/blog/2012/07/05/webtext-100-percent-width/
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Insightful Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Insightful Disagree Agree LikeBest
Rodrigo
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Insightful Disagree Agree LikeWhy would you need a generator/exporter?
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Insightful Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Insightful Disagree Agree LikeBut I think the master webfont should be crafted manually first, and that is the main and most important work.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
1 • Off Topic Insightful Disagree Agree 1Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Insightful Disagree Agree Like- Convert the PS-outlines to TT-outlines
- TT-Hinting (Manual or Half-manual depending of the type of use)
- Stripping OT-features if necessary
- Remove some of the least important kerning pairs to save file size
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Insightful Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- 1Troll
-4 • 4Off Topic 1Insightful 1Disagree Agree LikeWho said that was revolutionary? Rodrigo asked and I answered how I create a professional webfont from a Postscript source file.
Those kind of comments you just pulled remind me a lot of the bullshit on Typophile.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
4 • Off Topic Insightful 1Disagree 3Agree 1Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
1 • Off Topic Insightful Disagree Agree 1Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Insightful Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Insightful Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Insightful Disagree Agree LikeIt was my pleasure to play around with Medusa.
Latest Firefox and Chrome: Full support. Tested.
Latest Safari: Only kern, liga and calt at this moment. Tested. (Hopefully more in the future)
Latest IE10: Full support, at least in theory. Not yet tested.
His main concern was to have 'kern', 'liga' and 'calt' turned on. So, we are covered on that ones.
- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Insightful Disagree Agree Like- Spam
- Abuse
- Troll
0 • Off Topic Insightful Disagree Agree Like