It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Katy Mawhood said: No point reinventing the wheel, if we don't have to.
Theunis de Jong said:
I hardly can keep up with the demand for new forms… and my current toolchain does not support base-to-mark and mark-to-mark, so a lot of accents have to be wrestled in place manually.
Denis Moyogo Jacquerye said:Just because there’s only a handful of fonts that support these characters, that doesn’t mean we have to settle for “the characters are in the font and don’t look horrible”, having “everything looks good” would be nice.
Denis Moyogo Jacquerye said:
https://www.isoglosse.de/2016/06/fonts-for-phonetic-transcriptions/ is a good reference.Unfortunately, there are still some issues with its 5-star rated fonts.
Andreas Stötzner said:
@ChristopherBergmann: I wonder why Andron is the only typeface in the list lacking any stars at all. Is it that bad? ‘More styles’ missing is also not true. – You send me straight down into a final depression…